Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Valheim than Core i3-10105F - 233 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$84.95 vs CA$658.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-14900F - CA$0.42 vs CA$2.82 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
233
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.82/FPS
14.893617021276595%
Price, CA$
CA$658
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$658 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
86.69527896995707%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
48.145695364238414%
Multi-Core
4472
24.47728516694034%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |