Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400F - 766 vs 562 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$155.0 vs CA$678.98
- Up to 69% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900KF - CA$0.28 vs CA$0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
766
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$678.98
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$678.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
562
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |