Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-7700 - 227 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$187.88 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 56% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.92 vs CA$2.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
227
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.09/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
204
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$187.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$187.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |