Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1311 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 205 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - CA$49.99 vs CA$409.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900K - CA$0.32 vs CA$2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$409
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5216 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |