Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 102% better in War Thunder than FX-6100 - 256 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$83.57 vs CA$651.35
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for CA$651.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
Buy for CA$83.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |