Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 24% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1840 - 292 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$41.21 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.17 vs CA$1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
292
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$400
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
236
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |