Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 92% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1840 - 465 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$41.21 vs CA$404.05
- Up to 80% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900 - CA$0.17 vs CA$0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
465
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$404.05
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$404.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
242
52%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |