Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 28 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - CA$395.9 vs CA$615.99
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$615.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
99.4413407821229%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$395.9
100%
Buy for CA$395.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
75.16005121638925%
Multi-Core
6976
64.77853096852076%
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 12 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |