Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 194 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - CA$369.9 vs CA$1116.1
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10920X - CA$2.18 vs CA$5.75 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.75/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$1116.1
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,116.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |