Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 23% better in New World than FX-8350 - 121 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - CA$182.45 vs CA$1175.55
- Up to 81% better value when playing New World than Core i9-10920X - CA$1.86 vs CA$9.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 125 vs 165 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.72/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$1175.55
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,175.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
98
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |