Buy on Amazon
CA$699.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 503 vs 479 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$395.9 vs CA$699.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 24 vs 20 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core i9-10900K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
479
95.2286282306163%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$395.9
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-core/24-thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$395.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
67.12407089765581%
Multi-Core
6976
76.13227109025429%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
