Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 220 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$369.9 vs CA$393.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10900 - CA$1.72 vs CA$1.79 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$393.99
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$393.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
215
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |