Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Remnant II than FX-8350 - 91 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - CA$182.45 vs CA$405.88
- Up to 48% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-9700K - CA$2.31 vs CA$4.46 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
91
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.46/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$405.88
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$405.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
79
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |