Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 621 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 792 vs 751 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$259.99 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75187 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
751
94.82323232323232%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
18%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
75.59715945771465%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |