Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 216 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$318.99 vs CA$1580.77
- Up to 80% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$0.59 vs CA$2.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-9700F - 542 vs 538 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 48 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
538
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$318.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$318.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
542
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.92/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$1580.77
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |