Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 216 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$259.99 vs CA$1156.84
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-9700F - 194 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 48 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75199 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1156.84
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,156.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
92.92141571685663%
Multi-Core
6256
46.97754749568221%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |