Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 2600 - 262 vs 248 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - CA$142.72 vs CA$448.62
- Up to 66% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-9700F - CA$0.58 vs CA$1.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
262
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
33%
Price, CA$
CA$448.62
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$448.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
248
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |