Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1391 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6500.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i5-6500 - 203 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - CA$139.27 vs CA$309.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-9700F - CA$0.7 vs CA$1.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.53/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$309.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
198
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$139.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-6500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |