Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 369 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 2600 - 211 vs 203 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - CA$142.72 vs CA$262.38
- Up to 44% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-9700 - CA$0.7 vs CA$1.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
211
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$262.38
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$262.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
203
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |