Buy on Amazon
CA$185.3
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 3209 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-965 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$185.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor (YD190XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$185.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
