Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 856 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-940XM - 214 vs 213 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Clarksfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |