Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3872 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Stray than Core i7-920XM - 185 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 20 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |