Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 4061 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 14% better in God of War than Core i7-920XM - 185 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 24 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$379.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |