Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2629 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$153.98 vs CA$890.53
- Up to 58% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$2.41 vs CA$5.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 141% better in League of Legends than Core i7-880 - 154 vs 64 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 32 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
64
41.55844155844156%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4039 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.78/FPS
41.69550173010381%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |