Buy on Amazon
CA$153.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 3466 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$153.98 vs CA$912.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$0.98 vs CA$4.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 18% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i7-880 - 186 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 32 vs 8 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
157
84.40860215053763%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4006 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
186
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.91/FPS
19.959266802443988%
Price, CA$
CA$912.99
16%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$912.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
30.51643192488263%
Multi-Core
1653
15.454375467464473%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
