Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3048 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$112.0 vs CA$1005.68
- Up to 79% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$4.48 vs CA$20.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 92% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-875K - 48 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 24 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
25
52%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
48
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$20.95/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$1005.68
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,005.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |