Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2629 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$112.0 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Core i7-875K - 85 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 32 vs 8 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77387 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
85
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
43.46712211784799%
Multi-Core
1761
23.358535614803024%
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |