Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$253.92 vs CA$329.49
- Up to 16% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.47 vs CA$0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-7700T - 592 vs 536 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
536
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$253.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$253.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7330 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
592
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
83%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |