Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-7700T - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 24 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |