Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1620 - 238 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - CA$36.89 vs CA$181.62
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-7700 - CA$0.18 vs CA$0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
238
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$181.62
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$181.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
205
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |