Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1316 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-8350 - 126 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$182.45 vs CA$248.88
- Up to 14% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-6900K - CA$1.71 vs CA$1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.98/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
107
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |