Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 25% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8150 - 114 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - CA$87.12 vs CA$239.49
- Up to 54% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-6700T - CA$0.96 vs CA$2.1 per FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
114
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.1/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$239.49
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$239.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
91
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |