Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 588 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 1400 - 164 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - CA$87.08 vs CA$197.32
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-6700T - CA$0.54 vs CA$1.2 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$197.32
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$197.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11188 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
161
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |