Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1734 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$214.99 vs CA$259.45
- Up to 15% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-10320 - CA$2.05 vs CA$2.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-6700K - 108 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
105
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
108
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.4/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$259.45
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |