Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4960HQ outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4960HQ is 272 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4960HQ
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1620 - 200 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 47 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4960HQ | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Crystal Well | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |