Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $378
Availability
MSRP in USD: $378
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4810MQ outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4810MQ is 413 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Performs up to 4% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron G1620 - 157 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 47 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
151
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4810MQ
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
