Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1949 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$140.95 vs CA$552.98
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4770 - 171 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$140.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$552.98
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$552.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1188
93.24960753532181%
Multi-Core
3782
50.73785886772203%
Intel Core i7-4770 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |