Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2999 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$110.0 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.64 vs CA$1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 24% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-3820 - 215 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
173
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$388
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |