Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3879 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$110.0 vs CA$389.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.85 vs CA$2.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 14% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3820 - 147 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
129
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13374 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.65/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$389
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |