Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$132.38 vs CA$574.75
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-3770S - 237 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$132.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$574.75
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
52.51177394034537%
Multi-Core
2234
29.970485645291117%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |