Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$214.0 vs CA$359.22
- Up to 21% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-11600 - CA$1.22 vs CA$1.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 33% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-3770K - 234 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
176
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
79%
Price, CA$
CA$359.22
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$359.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |