Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1929 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-3770K - 307 vs 300 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$280.74 vs CA$350.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 24 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74237 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
307
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
60.221465076660984%
Multi-Core
2469
35.392775229357795%
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |