Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 218 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1620 - 161 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - CA$36.89 vs CA$180.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-3770 - CA$0.24 vs CA$1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 55 vs 77 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$180
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |