Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-3615QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3537 days newer than Core i7-3615QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3615QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3615QM - 176 vs 168 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
176
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3615QM | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |