Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i7-3615QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3243 days newer than Core i7-3615QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3615QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-3615QM - 132 vs 118 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3615QM | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |