Buy on Amazon
CA$150.42
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-3537U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2191 days newer than Core i7-3537U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3537U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3537U - 121 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3537U - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$150.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core™ i5-9400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores 4.1 GHz Turbo Without Graphics - 2.9 GHz (BX80684I59400F)
Buy for CA$150.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3537U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3537U | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-3537U or Core i5-9400F
Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum
43 FPS
CA$42.91/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-9400F
8 GB, 120 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,844.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
