Buy on Amazon
CA$329.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-3517U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2888 days newer than Core i7-3517U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3517U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-3517U - 236 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3517U - 20 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
236
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3517U
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3517U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
