Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-2960XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2167 days newer than Core i7-2960XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2960XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Core i7-2960XM - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2960XM - 24 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$382.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$382.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2960XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |