Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2830 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-2820QM - 101 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2820QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |