Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2150 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i7-2675QM - 185 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |