Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Core i7-2670QM - 259 vs 256 FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$96.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |